Villareal and Associates is Tulsa Oklahoma's premiere professional consulting, staffing and human resource firm!
Let Villareal and Associates represent you as an expert witness in cases involving employment discrimination, mitigation of damages, and estimation of earnings potential.












Expert Witness in cases from employment discrimination to employee compensation

Morey Villareal, firm principal, offers extensive experience serving as an expert witness for law firms, especially in cases involving employment discrimination, mitigation of damages, and job search and employment outlook.

Representative cases in which Mr. Villareal has testified as an expert witness and the associated topics addressed are listed below:

Representative court and expert witness cases associated with human resources issues, compensation and estimation of earnings potential.

1 Charles Threadgill vs. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.

Case No. 03-735 EA(J)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Boone Smith Davis Hurst & Dickman
-- Assessment of Defendant’s qualifications, employability and future compensation.  

2 Gary L. Paxton vs. Cheryl M. Paxton

Case No. FD 2002-1167
Tulsa County District Court
Firm: Wagner & Grundy, LLP
-- Assessment of Defendant’s qualifications, employability and future compensation.  

3 James Hanna vs. The Boeing Company

Case No. 03-CV 001 EA(C)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Boone Smith Davis Hurst & Dickman
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s employability, earnings potential and efforts to mitigate damages.  

4 Shannon Corbin vs. Git-N-Go, Inc.

Case No. 02-CV 974 H(M)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Strecker & Associates
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s qualifications, employability, future compensation, and efforts to mitigate damages.  

5 Theresa Jean Manchester vs. American Airlines, Inc.

Case No. 01-CV-9059P(C)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Conner & Winters
-- Assessment of Plaintiff employability and efforts to mitigate damages.  

6 Lorraine G. Nackos vs. UNISHIPPERS Association

Case No. 2:01 CV-851C
District Court, Central Division, District of Utah
Firm: Fillmore, Belliston, Sheffield, Madsen & Stubbs (Provo, UT)
-- Assessment of equal pay for equal work issues.  

7 Trenton Herd, et. al. vs. Asarco, Inc., et al.

Case No. 02-CV-500-H(M)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Joyce, Paul McDaniel and Albright, Rusher & Hardcastle
-- Assessment of the future employability of the plaintiffs.  

8 D. Lynn Williams vs. Kraft/Nabisco

Case No. 01-CV-800 EA
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Conner & Winters
-- Assessment of equal pay for equal work and efforts to mitigate damages.  

9 Judy Montgomery vs. Indiana Glass d/b/a/ Bartlett-Collins

Case No. 01-CV-712 B (J)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Pray Walker Jackman Williamson & Marlar
-- Assessment of equal pay for equal work.  

10 Nelson Toldeo vs. The Williams Companies, Inc., et al.

Case No. CIV-01-944
District Court, District of New Mexico
Firm: Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s qualifications versus comparators and efforts to mitigate damages.  

11 Laurie Bates vs. The Williams Companies

Case No. CV-0247-K (M)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of equal pay for equal work.  

12 Susan Pingaro vs. Bank of Texas, et al.

Case No. 3:00 CV-2782-P
District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
Firm: Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of equal pay issues and Plaintiff’s job search activities and mitigation of damages.  

13 Pauline Montoya vs. The Williams Companies, Inc., et al.

Case No. CIV-941-WWD/LFG
District Court of New Mexico
Firm: Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of qualifications versus comparators and efforts to mitigate damages.  

14 Denise Daniels vs. Jane Phillips Health Corporation

Case No. CJ-98-0001
Tulsa County District Court
Firm: Strecker & Associates
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s qualifications and employability and efforts to mitigate damages.  

15 Kenneth W. Hill, Personal Representative vs. The Streetman Company, Inc.

Case No. CJ-2000-3222
Tulsa County District Court
Firm: Stuart, Biolchini, Turner & Givray
-- Assessment of future earnings potential of decedent.  

16 Amy D. Miller vs. CompUSA, Inc.

Case No. CIV-00-1934 T
District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Firm: Joyce Paul & McDaniel, P.D.
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s qualifications and employability and efforts to mitigate damages.  

17 Joyce Daugherty vs. Stein Mart, Inc.

Case No. CIV-00-0557 K (J) District Court
Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Alliance Legal
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s qualifications and damages.  

18 Barbara Martin vs. DA/PRO Rubber, Inc.

Case No. CIV-00-0475H (M)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Conner & Winters
-- Assessment of job comparability and equal pay for equal work issues.  

19 Vernon Crownover vs. Southwestern Bell Telephone

Case No. CIV-99-1579-C
District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Firm: Boone, Smith, Davis, Hurst & Dickman
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s qualifications and marketability.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
-- Assessment of employment opportunities in Oklahoma City and Tulsa in relation to plaintiff’s qualifications.
  

20 Sandra K. Dabney vs. Conley Corp.

Case No. CIV 00-741-K (M)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Strecker & Associates
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
-- Assessment of company’s sexual harassment policies and practices.
  

21 James McMahen vs. Gaffey, Incorporated

Case No. CIV 00-626-H (E)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Strecker & Associates
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s qualifications and marketability.
-- Assessment of employment opportunities in Tulsa and in Arkansas in relation to plaintiff’s qualifications.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
  

22 Thach vs. Graphic Electronics, Incorporated

Case No. CJ-96-04334
Tulsa County District Court
Firm: Strecker & Associates
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s qualifications and marketability.
-- Assessment of employment opportunities in the Tulsa area and in Oklahoma in relation to plaintiff’s qualifications.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
  

23 Cathleen Williams vs. SEPM

Case No. CJ-99-00872
Tulsa County District Court
Firm: Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s qualifications and marketability.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s projected earnings.
-- Assessment of employment opportunities in Oklahoma and the surrounding states.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
  

24 Kileen Heidenreiter vs. Henry Production Incorporated, et al.

Case No. 99-CV-0405BU(E)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Bridger-Riley & Associates
-- Assessment of equal pay issues and damages to Plaintiff.  

25 Richard C. Allen vs. ZEECO, Inc.

Case No. 99-CV-4359C(J)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Johnson, Allen, Jones & Dornblaser
-- Assessment of alleged age discrimination against plaintiff.
-- Assessment of equity and competitiveness of plaintiff’s pay.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
  

26 C. Friedl vs. PacifiCare of Oklahoma

Case No. 98-CV-590K(E)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Boone, Smith, Davis, Hurst & Dickman
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
-- Calculation of possible damages.
  

27 Zimmerman vs. Tax & Accounting Software Corp.

Case No. 98-CZ-0164
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Malloy & Malloy
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s qualifications and damages.  

28 J. Forester vs. WilTel Communication Systems

Case No. 305958
Superior Court, State of Arizona
Firm: Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson
-- Verification and evaluation of plaintiff’s education and experience.
-- Identification of discrepancies in plaintiff’s applications and resumes.
  

29 Ronald K. Mason vs. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

Case No. CIV 93-1836 R
District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Firm: Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s marketability.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s future compensation opportunities.
  

30 Keeton vs. Keeton

Case No. FD 91-5151
Tulsa County District Court
Firm: Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson
-- Assessment of qualifications and earnings potential.  

31 Ronald K. Thomas vs. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.

Case No. 91-C-715-C
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of potential damages to plaintiff.
-- Identification and assessment of plaintiff’s qualifications in relation to promotion criteria.
  

32 McKenzie vs. Renberg's

Case No. 92-C-398-B
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Richardson, Stoops & Keating, and Eller and Detrich
-- Assessment of employability and calculation of damages.  

33 EEOC (E. Jordan) vs. Williams Telecommunications Group

Case No. CIV 92-026-S
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s qualifications in relation to job requirements.  

34 Oklahoma Corporation Commission vs. Oklahoma Natural Gas

Cause PUD No. 910001151
et al.
Firm: Huffman, Arrington, Kihle, Gaberino & Dunn
-- Assessment and testimony regarding ONG compensation practices.  

35 Allan vs. May's Drug Stores, Inc.

Case No. 91-C-220-E
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Moyers, Martin, Santee, Imel & Tetrick
-- Assessment of equal pay issues.  

36 Clayton Cothran and Julie Cothran vs. Metro Park Warehouses, Inc.

Case No. 91C-3239
District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas
Firm: Barrow Gaddis Griffith & Grimm
-- Assessment of Plaintiff’s qualifications and earnings potential.  

37 Paula J. Quillan vs. Transok, Inc.

Case No. 90-C-1020-E
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s qualifications for promotion and pay in relation to job requirements.
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search efforts and mitigation of damages.
  

38 Joe White vs. American Airlines

Case No. 82-C-755-C
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Boone Smith Davis Hurst & Dickman
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s marketability following termination.
-- Projection of plaintiff’s expected compensation.
-- Assessment of damages for wrongful discharge.
-- Assessment of efforts to mitigate damages.
  

39 Lola Larney vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case No. CIV-90-005-5
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Newton, O'Connor & Comstock
-- Assessment of plaintiff’s job search and efforts to mitigate damages.  

40 Huffman vs. Grant Corporations, Gandy vs. Grant Corporations, Wenck vs. Grant Corporations

Case Nos. CJ 84-3422, CJ 84-3424, CJ 84-3425
Firm: Norman, Wohlgemuth & Thompson
-- Assessment of competitiveness and appropriateness of executive pay practices.  

41 Texaco, Inc.'s Application for Adoption of Tin Parachutes

United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York
Firm: Baker & Botts (Houston, Texas)
-- Assessment of appropriateness and competitiveness of the executive compensation practices.  

42 Vernon B. Grubbs, Jr. vs. Texaco, Kent Pearson vs. Texaco, James W. Davis, Jr. vs. Texaco

Case Nos. (85-C-164-E), (85-C-237-E), (85-C-653-E)
District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Firm: Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson
-- Assessment of comparability of jobs and equal pay issues.